Position Paper #41
Journalist to the Godfather: Andrew Drummond's Two-Faced Alliance with Ricky Pandora, Pattaya's Self-Styled "Godfather of Pimps"
Documented proof of Andrew Drummond's enduring personal bond and compensated source arrangement with Ricky Pandora — the man who proudly calls himself the "Godfather of Pimps" and has operated Pattaya's most explicit go-go and blowjob venues for over 26 years. While Drummond denounces bar proprietors as pimps, he simultaneously receives intelligence from and shields the industry's most infamous figure.
Formal Position Paper
Prepared for: Andrew Drummond's Victims
Date: 19 February 2026
Reference: Rebuttal Document "Lies from Andrew Drummond" and Pre-Action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 13 August 2025 (Cohen Davis Solicitors)
🇹🇭 บทความนี้มีให้อ่านเป็นภาษาไทย — คลิกที่ปุ่มสลับภาษาด้านบน — This article is available in Thai — click the language toggle above
Overview
Andrew Drummond has made a habit of targeting Pattaya bar proprietors and expatriates, labelling them "pimps", "sex meat-grinders", "Poundland Mafia", and managers of "prostitution syndicates". He casts himself as a moral guardian dedicated to exposing exploitation within Thailand's entertainment sector.
However, among his oldest personal associates and most critical intelligence sources in Pattaya is Ricky Pandora — a man who openly embraces the moniker "Godfather of Pimps" and has managed some of the city's most explicit, hands-on go-go and blowjob venues for upwards of 26 years. Drummond frequented Ricky's bars as a paying patron for years, and Ricky continues supplying him with intelligence regarding competing bar owners and expatriates, thereby safeguarding his own business from Drummond's attacks.
This document lays out the complete forensic record of this contradictory relationship and establishes that it amounts to a serious violation of journalistic ethics, neutrality, and foundational standards of honesty. Any journalist who denounces the bar trade while sustaining an intimate personal and informational partnership with its most infamous operator cannot credibly assert that he practises genuine investigative reporting.
1. Analytical Approach
This position paper draws on an exhaustive forensic assessment of: two investigative reports outlining Ricky Pandora's business activities and his connection to Andrew Drummond; the full set of 19 original English-language articles and their 6 Thai-language versions published by Andrew Drummond (December 2024 – February 2026); screen captures of Drummond's personal Facebook remarks and Ricky Pandora's public declarations confirming their friendship and source arrangement; recorded interviews with Ricky Pandora on the Buzzin Pattaya YouTube channel (2021) where he discusses his direct bar management style; the 11-page rebuttal document "Lies from Andrew Drummond"; and website availability assessments for both domains carried out on 19 February 2026.
Each mention of bar owners, pimps, or the nightlife trade was verified against Drummond's documented friendship with Ricky Pandora.
2. Drummond's Persistent Attacks Against Pattaya Bar Proprietors and Expats
Throughout the 19-article campaign and his wider body of work, Drummond routinely:
- Brands bar proprietors as "pimps", "sex meat-grinders", and runners of "prostitution syndicates".
- Levels accusations of trafficking, exploitation, and operating "mafia-run" enterprises.
- Deploys inflammatory rhetoric calculated to ruin reputations and livelihoods.
- This narrative is fundamental to his self-portrayal as a campaigning journalist unmasking the "seedy underbelly" of Pattaya.
3. Ricky Pandora: Pattaya's Self-Styled "Godfather of Pimps"
Ricky Pandora has publicly characterised his venues as "the raunchiest, most hands-on establishments" in Pattaya, having operated them for more than 26 years. In frank 2021 interviews he acknowledges:
- Hands-on participation in recruiting, managing, and disciplining the women employed in his bars.
- Hosting explicit performances and running venues without appropriate licences for extended periods.
- Making routine "tea money" payments to police to sustain operations (a common practice in Pattaya owing to limited police budgets, though Drummond characterises it as wilfully ignoring unlawful conduct).
- Operating establishments including Pandora's, Vixen, Angelwich, and currently Lips Lounge on Soi Honey — a blowjob bar where patrons receive services directly at the bar counter.
- Ricky openly embraces the label "Godfather of Pimps" and is widely recognised in Pattaya as the most directly involved foreign bar operator in the city.
4. The Enduring Personal Bond and Source Arrangement
The evidence establishes that:
- Andrew Drummond was a habitual paying patron at Ricky Pandora's bars over many years, including the era when Ricky operated go-go bars in both Bangkok and Pattaya.
- Ricky has served as Drummond's principal Pattaya informant for over ten years, providing him with intelligence on competing bar owners and expatriates.
- Ricky openly describes Drummond as a longstanding friend and ally, and continues furnishing him with material to target rivals while ensuring his own venues remain untouched.
- Drummond has at no point disclosed this personal friendship or informant arrangement in any piece where he criticises the bar industry.
- This represents an obvious and concealed conflict of interest. Drummond targets the very sector in which his close associate and source holds a dominant position, while insulating Ricky from any examination.
5. The Double Standard: Denouncing the Very Ecosystem He Took Part In
The inconsistency is glaring:
- Drummond brands bar owners "pimps" and "exploiters" while sustaining a personal bond with the individual known as the "Godfather of Pimps".
- He spent years as a paying patron of Ricky's venues, yet now leverages Ricky's intelligence to undermine other bar operators' businesses.
- He declines to reveal this relationship, enabling him to portray himself as a neutral investigator while safeguarding his own informant and companion.
- This does not constitute journalism. It is selective, two-faced, and commercially driven coverage that advances the interests of a single bar owner (Ricky Pandora) to the detriment of others.
6. Legal and Ethical Ramifications
The concealed friendship and source relationship with Ricky Pandora amounts to:
- An evident conflict of interest and breakdown of impartiality under the IPSO Editors' Code and NUJ Code of Conduct.
- Misrepresentation (holding himself out as an independent investigator while depending on a compensated source from the very industry he targets).
- Heightened malice in any defamation proceedings, given that Drummond knowingly shields his own friend while harming others.
- The behaviour violates core journalistic principles and erodes public confidence in any assertion Drummond makes concerning the Pattaya bar trade.
Conclusion and Formal Demand
Andrew Drummond's longstanding alliance with Ricky Pandora — the self-styled "Godfather of Pimps" and one of Pattaya's most directly involved bar operators — together with his habitual patronage of Ricky's venues and continued reliance on Ricky as his chief source, reveals a degree of duplicity that obliterates any pretence of journalistic credibility. He condemns bar owners as pimps while receiving intelligence from and protecting the industry's most infamous individual.
On behalf of Andrew Drummond's Victims, we demand, within 14 days of the date of this position paper:
- The immediate, permanent, and simultaneous takedown of all 19 original articles and their 6 translations from both andrew-drummond.com and andrew-drummond.news.
- Publication of a comprehensive, unqualified retraction and apology on both websites for no fewer than twelve months, expressly acknowledging the concealed friendship and source arrangement with Ricky Pandora and the consequent duplicity.
- Written commitments not to republish any of the allegations or enter into any further undisclosed relationships with sources within the industries he targets.
Non-compliance will lead to the immediate commencement of High Court proceedings without additional notice, seeking substantial damages (including aggravated and exemplary damages), injunctive relief, costs on an indemnity basis, and all other available remedies.
All rights are expressly reserved.
— End of Position Paper #41 —
Share:
Subscribe
Stay Informed — New Papers Published Regularly
Subscribe to receive notification whenever a new position paper, evidence brief, or legal update is published.